Today I read a story completely surreal. Dear recinteros, attention to the headlines: " Disney requires the owner of a Dutch coffeeshop storefront remove a picture of Nemo smoking a joint" .
The casino in question is located in Rotterdam and is called " Nemo." It is for this reason that the owner could not think of a better idea to attract a clientele with a pattern known as alluding to goldfish.
For starters, these establishments may be sold and consumption of marijuana what is wrong then to use an advertised (that since the bar's name comes from a very short story) based on something that is legal?
On the other hand, I do I think any kind of Disney is believed that the target audience to be as original poster display will be less than, say .. "15?
all know that at that age (and much earlier too) the youngsters are anything but a candid retina that can be wound with allusions to his favorite cartoon film.
By the way, no there were rumors that the film "Lion King", any viewer could hear perfectly innocent of what " me a billion dollars " ? (I am not a full expression to avoid hurting the sensibilities of my readers) ... ..
The company in question (Walt Disney), based his argument califificando of " repugnant" to relate to a media personality like Nemo soft drugs ("character half ... .. what? Damn, that is a cartoon!)
The case is that the owner, so to avoid a trial for the right to property, decided to change the goldfish by a sperm (of course also in attitude smoker).
Upon seeing this change, Disney spokesmen breathe easy, because the whale seemed much more appropriate and unknown (did not appear a Pinocchio, by the way?)
Gentlemen, do not care if you smoke dope or not the bar " Nemo." Moreover, even it does not matter any innocent child go ahead and see the funny picture of a whale with a joint. What is unforgivable is that it is Nemo himself in person (or rather, in fish) who becomes a claim ... ... Where we pararrrr !!!...
0 comments:
Post a Comment